Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Licinius Junior
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 8249773, member: 110350"]Thank you. So if I understand correctly, the sign after the II is not a gamma (Γ) but a lower-case mu (μ) -- which explains the sources describing that part of the formula as IIM -- and, according to RIC, a lower-case mu is a sign or symbol ("episemon") for a Semis or 1/2. So under this theory, the value of the coin supposedly = 12 1/2 denarii, not that the denarius was still being used as a denomination by then so far as I know.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 8249773, member: 110350"]Thank you. So if I understand correctly, the sign after the II is not a gamma (Γ) but a lower-case mu (μ) -- which explains the sources describing that part of the formula as IIM -- and, according to RIC, a lower-case mu is a sign or symbol ("episemon") for a Semis or 1/2. So under this theory, the value of the coin supposedly = 12 1/2 denarii, not that the denarius was still being used as a denomination by then so far as I know.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Licinius Junior
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...