Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Licinius II (the younger)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="gsimonel, post: 2941325, member: 82549"]Considering the strike and the condition, I'd say you got a great buy. Really beautiful coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>To add to Doug's post, terms like scarce, rare, and common were used to describe the number of coins of that particular issue from that particular mint. For example, there are a great number of coins of, say, Maximian from Heraclea with a GENIO POPVLI ROMANI reverse. Some may have something like HB for a mint mark, while others might have HTB, indicating that they were minted later. RIC vol. VI assigns these coins different rarity ratings.</p><p><br /></p><p>RIC vol. VII, however, which catalogs your coins, breaks the distinction down even smaller, and assigns rarity values based on the number of coins from each officina, or section, of each mint. So your coin with the Delta in the mint mark is rated scarce, but the exact same coin with an Epsilon would be rated rare. Nowadays, I think most collectors aren't very concerned with such fine--I might say "pedantic" if I were trying to impress someone--distinctions. (Are you impressed?) In many cases I don't think it's clear whether these ratings reflect the number of coins minted or just preservation.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="gsimonel, post: 2941325, member: 82549"]Considering the strike and the condition, I'd say you got a great buy. Really beautiful coin. To add to Doug's post, terms like scarce, rare, and common were used to describe the number of coins of that particular issue from that particular mint. For example, there are a great number of coins of, say, Maximian from Heraclea with a GENIO POPVLI ROMANI reverse. Some may have something like HB for a mint mark, while others might have HTB, indicating that they were minted later. RIC vol. VI assigns these coins different rarity ratings. RIC vol. VII, however, which catalogs your coins, breaks the distinction down even smaller, and assigns rarity values based on the number of coins from each officina, or section, of each mint. So your coin with the Delta in the mint mark is rated scarce, but the exact same coin with an Epsilon would be rated rare. Nowadays, I think most collectors aren't very concerned with such fine--I might say "pedantic" if I were trying to impress someone--distinctions. (Are you impressed?) In many cases I don't think it's clear whether these ratings reflect the number of coins minted or just preservation.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Licinius II (the younger)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...