Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;tmoneyeagles, post: 4363396, member: 17557&quot;]<img src="https://i.imgur.com/DrBmSHL.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>Coin is scary blast white in hand. I definitely captured the in-hand appearance a little bit better than the last commemorative shot I took of the sesquicentennial half I bought a couple weeks back. Numismatic photography is fun when it&#039;s not making me question the very essence of my being.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here are the re-shoots of the 1926 Sesquicentennial. First is direct lighting, second is diffused. It&#039;s by far the weirdest coin I&#039;ve ever tried to photograph. I&#039;ve definitely lessened the overexposure from the first shot I had. The luster and colour in hand is a happy medium between the two shots.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/xukYqhT.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/fpW7kjy.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in