Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;RonSanderson, post: 26405045, member: 77413&quot;]It looks like I tore down my photography setup about a year ago. I still have &quot;newest acquisitions&quot; that I am just starting to photograph now.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is a&nbsp; 1966 SMS that I bought as a standard for what a MS67 should look like. Unfortunately, an SMS does not look much like a business strike, so it wasn&#039;t really any use for setting up a grading standard. Still, it was under $10, and it did make me think that my existing 66 SMS (post <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/post-your-lincolns.192928/page-224#post-2674373" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/post-your-lincolns.192928/page-224#post-2674373">#4473</a>) is also MS67. Or higher?</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Existing coin:</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1684641[/ATTACH]</p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>New&nbsp; coin:</b></p><p><b>[ATTACH=full]1684638[/ATTACH] </b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>Full Resolution Photos:</b></p><p><b>[ATTACH=full]1684639[/ATTACH] </b></p><p><b>[ATTACH=full]1684640[/ATTACH] </b>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in