Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mat, post: 1934202, member: 21445&quot;]Latest addition to my collection is Tetricus I &amp; Tetricus II. I loved the portrait of Tetricus I and felt Tetricus II was a bit better then average for him as a whole coin wise.</p><p><br /></p><p>Both these emperors are considered junk in the roman coin world due to poor flans and strikes.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://s14.postimg.org/yfr9e4jip/teti.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>Tetricus I (271 - 274 A.D.)</p><p>Æ Antoninianus</p><p>O: IMP C TETRICVS P F AVG, radiate and cuirassed bust right.</p><p>R: VICTORIA AVG, Victory walking left, wreath in right, palm frond in left.</p><p>Colonia Agrippinensis (Cologne, Germany) mint, 271 A.D.</p><p>3g</p><p>19mm</p><p>RIC V, part II, 139</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://s9.postimg.org/d1ev4sn7j/tetii.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>Tetricus II (274 A.D.)</p><p>AE Antoninianus</p><p>O: C PIV ESV TETRICVS CAES, radiate, draped bust right.</p><p>R: SPES AVGG, Spes walking left, holding flower and raising skirt.</p><p>2.9g</p><p>19mm</p><p>RIC 270[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in