Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;blu62vette, post: 1116244, member: 17342&quot;]I will strongly say that line between BN/RB/RD is not my specialty. I get shown coins and people will say isnt this a red? And I say why would it be? So your question was which image looks more 67+RD, I feel the bottom image looks more RD. The top image does not look very red. </p><p><br /></p><p>Was PCGS ever more lenient on RD coins? I ask this because it is something for a copper collector to know and here is why.....When it comes to DMPL Morgans many OGH coins would not DMPL today. Yet if I submit for a regrade I cannot lose the DMPL designation. So can someone submit a OGH RD coin that may have been borderline get a bump and keep the RD? I am not saying that happened with this coin, but it is something to think about. </p><p><br /></p><p>Also the coin in question has some very red areas that make the rest of the coin look not as red, but in reality the rest of the coin may be red on it&#039;s own merit. If the coin was all the color of the obv bottom third (non toned area) would it be red on it&#039;s own? I dont know that answer, I am just saying the heavy red areas may make the less red areas seem even less than they are. </p><p><br /></p><p>I dont know the %&#039;s for RD/RB/BN an have seen many coins that have confused me on this issue. I shot a couple complete PCGS RD IHC collections last year so I do know that RD is different for different years.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in