Let's see your newest acquisitions!

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by H8_modern, Feb 25, 2011.

  1. Travlntiques

    Travlntiques Well-Known Member

    Hey Caz! Do I see some doubling on the "CC" of your 1876, or just some metal disturbance?
    BOTM ~ Bust out the magnifier.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Cazkaboom

    Cazkaboom One for all, all for me.

    Man, I hope not! I'll take a look though.
     
  4. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    I'm very excited about this coin - it fits my registry set aesthetic: great color and one off the top pop at 152/7. I paid a reasonable premium for the toning without spending big bucks for an extra grade point. At 67 I'm expecting a lot of luster, and I'm guessing the colors are much more vibrant than the seller's washed-out images would indicate.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  5. coinguy-matthew

    coinguy-matthew Ike Crazy

    Nice coin and i thought you said clad never tones good....:jumping-jack:
     
  6. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    I was wrong. I had spent some time looking through mint sets that had probably already been picked over, and only found some very drab toners. But a recent purchase from NFC changed my mind. The image wasn't good, but when I got it in hand, the colors were astonishing: bright neon-metallic blues and honey. I'm expecting something similar from this coin.
     
  7. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    Some more hole fillers, but since I'm working a complete date set, I've got to fill the holes.

    These are all PR69DCAMS - the pops at 70 for these dates are very low, so it puts the highest grade out of my budget, not to mention they're very hard to find. The 73 is 5,337/17, the 74 is 6,329/19 and the 76 SILVER 19,303/53. Two of them were Dutch auctions, but I've only had to return one 69 so far, and that wasn't because I disagreed with the grade, but rather because the toning was unattractive.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Travlntiques

    Travlntiques Well-Known Member

    These two gals should be in the mail today.
    $(KGrHqJ,!h!FBjPTbY(RBQfw7QCYg!~~60_57.jpg $(KGrHqRHJEMFDRRPdb1kBQ9NT7IHPg~~60_57.jpg
     
  9. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    Picked up a little herd.

    1916-D
    [​IMG]
    1927-P
    [​IMG]
    1928-S

    [​IMG]
     
  10. Zachkeaton

    Zachkeaton Cervus non Servus

    Great color on the 1916!
     
  11. Cazkaboom

    Cazkaboom One for all, all for me.

    Managed to get this for a good deal.[​IMG]

    One can wish right? :devil:
     
  12. Chiefbullsit

    Chiefbullsit CRAZY HORSE

    Must be nice to have $10,000,000 in coin money.

    Hey big man, let me hold a dollar...:D
     
  13. iGradeMS70

    iGradeMS70 AKA BustHalfBrian

    Meh, I've seen better... :rolleyes::D

    I believe the new, proud owner of this coin is an active forumite over at PCGS.

    Now that is quite the acquisition.
     
  14. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    If it's plugged shouldn't it be in a "Gen" holder code 84????
     
  15. Raymond Beracha

    Raymond Beracha Active Member

  16. I think you are being facetious, but just in case you aren't.

    No because it was plugged before it was struck. Weight adjustment.
     
  17. Mat

    Mat Ancient Coincoholic

    Even that makes me jaw drop. Wouldnt pay what it cost though :eek:
     
  18. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

  19. geekpryde

    geekpryde Husband and Father Moderator

    I was wondering that too, good to know!
     
  20. SSG_Gonzo

    SSG_Gonzo Well-Known Member

  21. mill rat41

    mill rat41 Member

    It was bought by Legend, and is not for sale anytime soon.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page