Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="jester3681, post: 2752265, member: 53130"]My recent NGC ---> PCGS crossover submission just hit. Mr. Arnold did a magnificent job on the TrueViews, so I thought I would share. [ATTACH=full]630705[/ATTACH] OH165CY-110a (Formerly OH100B-3a, and listed as such on the label) - Listed as R.9, probably closer to R.6 - likely a census example. NGC and PCGS agreed - MS63BN. Love the tone! [ATTACH=full]630706[/ATTACH] OH200B-1a - Listed as R.6 - this example has an "almost clip" on the obverse at 8 o'clock. NGC and PCGS agreed - MS62BN. [ATTACH=full]630707[/ATTACH]OH-46-5B (PCGS has this listed as a -25B, so I'll need to verify the error on the label and possible send it back for reholder) - Listed as R.8 - likely the finest known, or nearly so. I like this example, and so did James Kurto, Paul Koppenhaver, David Schenkman, Steve Tanenbaum, and Rick Irons. This coin was plated in the 2ed Sutler's Guide. NGC and PCGS agreed - MS61. [ATTACH=full]630708[/ATTACH] OH-26-10B - Listed as R.9 - likely the finest known. From the John J. Ford, Jr. Collection. NGC and PCGS agreed - AU58. The NGC label noted the Ford pedigree, hopefully the PCGS one does as well, otherwise it goes back too. I'm going to be on the phone with PCGS Tuesday morning to try to catch the submission before it comes back, but I have a feeling it's already in transit. I kind of get the feeling PCGS phoned in this submission, but that's ok - I agreed with the grades as submitted.[/QUOTE]