Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Let's chat about the Dreaded Hairlines, Die Scratches and Polish Line Scratches.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 1696824, member: 112"]Slider I think your coin is a bit different. Your pictures have a reflection that is in effect doubling just about everything on the coin. This doubling effect (reflection) is much more severe in some places than others. So where we should only see 1 mark, spot, ding, (choose your word), we are instead seeing 2 of them. For example, look at the bridge of the nose, the date, the bottom legend, etc.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, it is pretty common with Proofs from this era to find what look like tiny, white spots scattered all over the coin. They are not spots per se, (sometimes they are), but are instead tiny flecks of dust that show up as white in pictures. Most of the time these are tiny flecks of cardboard dust that come from albums & 2x2s. And those flecks of cardboard dust can also create tiny little scratches from an album slide causing them to move across the coin, or from the coin moving around inside a 2x2. </p><p><br /></p><p>Your coin also has several contact marks on it, some rather severe for a Proof coin; in particular the reverse, but there are some small ones on the obverse as well. This clearly indicates that the coin at some point in its life has undergone some rough handling, for Proof coins, as a general rule, never come into contact with other coins. And that rough handling is undoubtedly also the cause of at least some of the chatter we see on the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>All of this combined, coupled with all of the spots on the devices - which are typically not caused by anything having to do with the die - indicate that a lot of what you see on your coin did indeed have nothing to do with the die. </p><p><br /></p><p>That said, Proofs from this era are well known for having been struck with worn out dies. At that point in time the mint simply didn't care how the Proofs turned out. An obvious example of this is the scarcity of cameo examples. When the frost on the die wore out, they simply went right on striking coins, of to the point that other die wear and deterioration became evident.</p><p><br /></p><p>But there are almost always clues as to what caused what we see on the coins. We just have to be aware of the existence of these clues so we know what we see, when we see it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 1696824, member: 112"]Slider I think your coin is a bit different. Your pictures have a reflection that is in effect doubling just about everything on the coin. This doubling effect (reflection) is much more severe in some places than others. So where we should only see 1 mark, spot, ding, (choose your word), we are instead seeing 2 of them. For example, look at the bridge of the nose, the date, the bottom legend, etc. Also, it is pretty common with Proofs from this era to find what look like tiny, white spots scattered all over the coin. They are not spots per se, (sometimes they are), but are instead tiny flecks of dust that show up as white in pictures. Most of the time these are tiny flecks of cardboard dust that come from albums & 2x2s. And those flecks of cardboard dust can also create tiny little scratches from an album slide causing them to move across the coin, or from the coin moving around inside a 2x2. Your coin also has several contact marks on it, some rather severe for a Proof coin; in particular the reverse, but there are some small ones on the obverse as well. This clearly indicates that the coin at some point in its life has undergone some rough handling, for Proof coins, as a general rule, never come into contact with other coins. And that rough handling is undoubtedly also the cause of at least some of the chatter we see on the coin. All of this combined, coupled with all of the spots on the devices - which are typically not caused by anything having to do with the die - indicate that a lot of what you see on your coin did indeed have nothing to do with the die. That said, Proofs from this era are well known for having been struck with worn out dies. At that point in time the mint simply didn't care how the Proofs turned out. An obvious example of this is the scarcity of cameo examples. When the frost on the die wore out, they simply went right on striking coins, of to the point that other die wear and deterioration became evident. But there are almost always clues as to what caused what we see on the coins. We just have to be aware of the existence of these clues so we know what we see, when we see it.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Let's chat about the Dreaded Hairlines, Die Scratches and Polish Line Scratches.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...