Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Lessons in problem coins: Whizzed.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 3156467, member: 15309"]Doug and Kurt were talking past each other because they is what they do. I've been debating Doug on this forum for 10 years, trust me, he will never concede any point, EVER. And the majority of his arguments are based on silly semantics, just like this one. You are a good disciple though, further muddying the waters by separating whizzing into the "method" and "description" of damage.</p><p><br /></p><p>If that weren't enough, you attempt to obfuscate the issue further by introducing an analogy in the most divisive arena within numismatics, toning. However, you have stumbled, by accident, into the very reason why "method" doesn't matter. When evaluating a coin, you have only the coin. You don't have information on what happened to that coin before it got to you. You can only decide based on the surfaces of the coin, your best guess at to what happened. In the toning world, people like Doug will tell you that what separates artificial toning from natural toning is intent. He states this knowing full well that the intent of the previous owners is a impossible to obtain. All you can do is look at the toning and decide if the indicators tell you the toning is original or artificial.</p><p><br /></p><p>Likewise, when looking at a whizzed coin, there is absolutely no way to definitively say whether a metal brush or plastic brush was used to impart the metal displacement. You can never know that information, so just like "intent" with respect to toning, "method" with respect to whizzing is meaningless. Almost everyone who looked at the OP's coin thought it was whizzed because it has the same look that all whizzed coins show, simulated luster in the fields. Doug doesn't even dispute that, he simply disqualifies it because it doesn't show what he considers the "tell tale" sign of metal buildup at the devices. </p><p><br /></p><p>I'm curious, have you ever seen a whizzed coin in hand?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 3156467, member: 15309"]Doug and Kurt were talking past each other because they is what they do. I've been debating Doug on this forum for 10 years, trust me, he will never concede any point, EVER. And the majority of his arguments are based on silly semantics, just like this one. You are a good disciple though, further muddying the waters by separating whizzing into the "method" and "description" of damage. If that weren't enough, you attempt to obfuscate the issue further by introducing an analogy in the most divisive arena within numismatics, toning. However, you have stumbled, by accident, into the very reason why "method" doesn't matter. When evaluating a coin, you have only the coin. You don't have information on what happened to that coin before it got to you. You can only decide based on the surfaces of the coin, your best guess at to what happened. In the toning world, people like Doug will tell you that what separates artificial toning from natural toning is intent. He states this knowing full well that the intent of the previous owners is a impossible to obtain. All you can do is look at the toning and decide if the indicators tell you the toning is original or artificial. Likewise, when looking at a whizzed coin, there is absolutely no way to definitively say whether a metal brush or plastic brush was used to impart the metal displacement. You can never know that information, so just like "intent" with respect to toning, "method" with respect to whizzing is meaningless. Almost everyone who looked at the OP's coin thought it was whizzed because it has the same look that all whizzed coins show, simulated luster in the fields. Doug doesn't even dispute that, he simply disqualifies it because it doesn't show what he considers the "tell tale" sign of metal buildup at the devices. I'm curious, have you ever seen a whizzed coin in hand?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Lessons in problem coins: Whizzed.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...