Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Gregg, post: 3156223, member: 90419&quot;]That is where I waver a bit still in the definition as you&#039;ve written methodology into the definition (high rpm) in addition to the description of the damage.</p><p><br /></p><p>What if (theoretically) a guy could use lasers to mimic flow lines and they looked exactly like the high rotation flow lines?&nbsp; Would the coin be whizzed or would we have to call it lasered?</p><p><br /></p><p>That is why I like whizzed being only descriptive of the damage and entirely independent of the methodology.&nbsp; The methodology doesn&#039;t really matter, the impact on the coin is all that matters.</p><p><br /></p><p>Am I being too particular here or does that make sense?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in