I have a question about the Obverse lettering: +LЄOn bASILЄVS ROm This is how the Reference Sear 1729 indicates that this coins spelling should be, however as you can see my coin is missing the letter "n" after the LEO on the beginning of the Obverse spelling...? I have had several Leo VI coins and this is the first time that I have come across this, can I get some expert opinions on what is going on here and what this may mean for this particular coin..?? 29.mm 9.1gm
There is something about the way some things are wavy that usually are straight that makes me not like this coin. I do not know enough about this period to have an opinion worth stating but would ask Byzantine experts if this might be a contemporary counterfeit. My example with N for comparison.
Thanks for your insight, I am an artist by trade so from my point of view I find it unthinkable for a forger to create a counterfeit of this or any coin, and leave a letter out??? Isn't the object of a counterfeit to be indistinguishable from an original...? However yes I too have seen other ancient coins with missing letters and have deemed some of them modern day copies...
Here is the original auction if anyone is curious if you want to see the tag that came with it when I sold the coin. https://www.ebay.com/itm/303985943793?ViewItem=&item=303985943793
Sort of. Many of the barbaric imitations/counterfeits have artists/celators who failed to understand the reversing of a die, and often have retrograde legends or letters. Sometimes they gave up on copying lettering altogether and just did their own thing:
Of 63 examples in the Dumbarton Oaks catalogue, only one (III.2, p. 521, 8.60) has a variant obverse legend, ending "LVSROm". The same coin has "P for b" on reverse. According to Sear, "This [type] appears to have been issued in greater quantities than almost any other individual type in the Byzantine series", suggesting that a lot of dies must have been cut. Perhaps the error was overlooked or not considered serious enough to scrap the die.