Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Leadfoot, post: 440053, member: 2972&quot;]Case in point -- Shawn Yancey:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.earlycoppercoins.com/id8.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.earlycoppercoins.com/id8.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.earlycoppercoins.com/id8.htm</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Look for the 1793 S-16 electrotype.&nbsp; Are you suggesting Shawn is breaking the law?</p><p><br /></p><p>Second case in point -- Heritage:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://coins.ha.com/common/search_results.php?Ntt=electrotype&amp;Ntk=SI_Titles&amp;N=51+790+231" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://coins.ha.com/common/search_results.php?Ntt=electrotype&amp;Ntk=SI_Titles&amp;N=51+790+231" rel="nofollow">http://coins.ha.com/common/search_results.php?Ntt=electrotype&amp;Ntk=SI_Titles&amp;N=51+790+231</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Are you suggesting Heritage broke the law?</p><p><br /></p><p>Moral of the story - you can&#039;t read the laws and pretend to understand their application.&nbsp; One needs to understand how the law is enforced and the caselaw surrounding the USC before making blanket statements as you have.</p><p><br /></p><p>Respectfully...Mike[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in