Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Lazy TPG Attributions and Suggested Improvements
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8473129, member: 24314"]ldhair, posted: "I can't guess what testing NGC did. They may have done more than we know." </p><p><br /></p><p><b><font size="6"><span style="color: #ff0000">EXACTLY!</span> </font></b> That's why IMO, posting a <span style="color: #ff0000">VALID Question</span> about a <span style="color: #ff0000">VALID Possibility</span> by a fellow error authority <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie26" alt=":bookworm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie33" alt=":cigar:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> belongs with the NGC representatives or the NGC Forum!!! Error authentication should never appear to be a <b><font size="6"><span style="color: #b3b300"><i>"My stream goes higher up the wall thing!" <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></i></span></font></b></p><p><br /></p><p>JCro57, posted: "If I am paying NGC to attribute the error, they should be the ones doing the work [<i><span style="color: #660033">and you were in the grading room to know what they did or did not do?</span></i>] seeing what foreign coins the Mint made during that time, not me. </p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #660033">I agree. </span></i></p><p><br /></p><p>2. If you are going to put "foreign planchet" on the label, put your credibiliy on the line and say which one. If not, then obviously they don't know. So, dont put it on there.</p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #660033">If it is indeed on a foreign planchet, perhaps their were several possibil</span></i>ities. </p><p><br /></p><p>3. A person's reputation means nothing to me if they don't get it right. I don't care who it is, what their role at a grading company is, how many books they wrote, or how long they've been in the business.</p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #660033">Ditto. When a TPGS gives an opinion they have millions of watchdogs checking their work. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie50" alt=":happy:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> This is a good thing. However, I for one don't like <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> how you are going about making sure any possible mistake is corrected. </span></i></p><p><br /></p><p>I'm 99.9% sure this is a rolled thin Jefferson nickel planchet if the composition and diameter are that of a Jefferson nickel.</p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #660033">My first impression is that you may be correct. Have you bothered to contact NGC with your concerns yet?</span></i></p><p><br /></p><p>Sorry, but I stand by "laziness" here. </p><p><br /></p><p><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <i><span style="color: #660033">Lazy makes no sense. If you are correct it is a mistake (label error</span></i> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />).</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>JCro57, continued: "Well, if they charge an extra fee simply because it is an error, that means I am paying for their mint error experts to properly attribute the error [<i><span style="color: #660033">agree</span></i>]; I'm not just sending it in for a grade. Why should I pay for a service when they're not willing to do the work [?? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <i><span style="color: #660033">You don't know what they did or did not do. You were not there! Please contact NGC and see what they did </span><b><span style="color: #ff0000">OR</span></b><span style="color: #660033"> is this some coin on the Internet you found<b> and don't own</b>? Please keep us informed.</span></i>] on their end? In that case, don't offer error attributions at all.</p><p><br /></p><p>In fact, most hardcore error collectors that I know, myself included, don't really care much about grade and care more about the eye appeal as well as the type of error that it is.</p><p>Not attributing it properly can both cause someone to lose a lot of money and also overpay a lot of money. [<i><span style="color: #660033">Agree</span></i>]</p><p><br /></p><p>The seller is asking for over $400 for this coin, but if it is a rolled thin planchet (which I am confident it is) many won't even pay $100 for it. This should not have been a difficult thing to look into or figure out for experts at NGC.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thus, again, I stick to my charge of laziness." <span style="color: #b3b300">I guess your stream goes higher up the wall on this forum. </span><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8473129, member: 24314"]ldhair, posted: "I can't guess what testing NGC did. They may have done more than we know." [B][SIZE=6][COLOR=#ff0000]EXACTLY![/COLOR] [/SIZE][/B] That's why IMO, posting a [COLOR=#ff0000]VALID Question[/COLOR] about a [COLOR=#ff0000]VALID Possibility[/COLOR] by a fellow error authority :bookworm::cigar: belongs with the NGC representatives or the NGC Forum!!! Error authentication should never appear to be a [B][SIZE=6][COLOR=#b3b300][I]"My stream goes higher up the wall thing!" o_O[/I][/COLOR][/SIZE][/B] JCro57, posted: "If I am paying NGC to attribute the error, they should be the ones doing the work [[I][COLOR=#660033]and you were in the grading room to know what they did or did not do?[/COLOR][/I]] seeing what foreign coins the Mint made during that time, not me. [I][COLOR=#660033]I agree. [/COLOR][/I] 2. If you are going to put "foreign planchet" on the label, put your credibiliy on the line and say which one. If not, then obviously they don't know. So, dont put it on there. [I][COLOR=#660033]If it is indeed on a foreign planchet, perhaps their were several possibil[/COLOR][/I]ities. 3. A person's reputation means nothing to me if they don't get it right. I don't care who it is, what their role at a grading company is, how many books they wrote, or how long they've been in the business. [I][COLOR=#660033]Ditto. When a TPGS gives an opinion they have millions of watchdogs checking their work. :happy: This is a good thing. However, I for one don't like :( how you are going about making sure any possible mistake is corrected. [/COLOR][/I] I'm 99.9% sure this is a rolled thin Jefferson nickel planchet if the composition and diameter are that of a Jefferson nickel. [I][COLOR=#660033]My first impression is that you may be correct. Have you bothered to contact NGC with your concerns yet?[/COLOR][/I] Sorry, but I stand by "laziness" here. :rolleyes: [I][COLOR=#660033]Lazy makes no sense. If you are correct it is a mistake (label error[/COLOR][/I] o_O:D). JCro57, continued: "Well, if they charge an extra fee simply because it is an error, that means I am paying for their mint error experts to properly attribute the error [[I][COLOR=#660033]agree[/COLOR][/I]]; I'm not just sending it in for a grade. Why should I pay for a service when they're not willing to do the work [?? :rolleyes: [I][COLOR=#660033]You don't know what they did or did not do. You were not there! Please contact NGC and see what they did [/COLOR][B][COLOR=#ff0000]OR[/COLOR][/B][COLOR=#660033] is this some coin on the Internet you found[B] and don't own[/B]? Please keep us informed.[/COLOR][/I]] on their end? In that case, don't offer error attributions at all. In fact, most hardcore error collectors that I know, myself included, don't really care much about grade and care more about the eye appeal as well as the type of error that it is. Not attributing it properly can both cause someone to lose a lot of money and also overpay a lot of money. [[I][COLOR=#660033]Agree[/COLOR][/I]] The seller is asking for over $400 for this coin, but if it is a rolled thin planchet (which I am confident it is) many won't even pay $100 for it. This should not have been a difficult thing to look into or figure out for experts at NGC. Thus, again, I stick to my charge of laziness." [COLOR=#b3b300]I guess your stream goes higher up the wall on this forum. [/COLOR]:D[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Lazy TPG Attributions and Suggested Improvements
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...