Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Publius2, post: 13842111, member: 105571&quot;]First, what a wonderful 1830 LM-1.1!!!!&nbsp; Glad you got it after the auction.&nbsp; But since it won&#039;t cross to PCGS in your favor, I&#039;m sure you want to dispose of it.&nbsp; Let me know-LOL!</p><p><br /></p><p>OK, to the idea of a clashless 1829 13.1:</p><p><br /></p><p>LM states that the dies clashed during the initial striking of 1829 13.1.&nbsp; So there should be 1829 LM-13.1 coins without die clashes.&nbsp; I show below closeups of my 13.1 showing the clashes.&nbsp; Where are the clashless 13.1s?&nbsp; Presumably, LM saw them in order to for them to state that the clashes occurred during the striking of 13.1.</p><p><br /></p><p>Meaney&#039;s argument relies not on a clashless 13.1 but on a completely clashless emission of 1830 LM-1.1.&nbsp; That doesn&#039;t preclude that the clashes occurred during the striking of 1829 LM-13.1.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, I don&#039;t think I agree with your proposition that the first clashes show up with 13.2.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1530542[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1530539[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in