Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Latest Faustina Senior is an architectural issue
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 4020458, member: 75937"]An update to the OP. I have since acquired two similar denarii, each issued earlier and for the dedication of the temple in AD 143.</p><p><br /></p><p>The first bears the inscription, DEDICATIO AEDIS ("the dedication of the temple"). It comes in two bust types, one bare-headed and another with a veiled bust, known from only a handful of examples: the Paris specimen cited by Cohen and Strack, and an example in a private collection cited by Temeryazev & Makarenko. An <a href="https://research.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1210487&partId=1&searchText=Faustina+1937,0708.26&page=1" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://research.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1210487&partId=1&searchText=Faustina+1937,0708.26&page=1" rel="nofollow">example in the British Museum</a> (1937,0708.26) with a veiled bust wearing a stephane is considered to be an ancient forgery made of base metal. My example is, of course, the bare-headed version:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1057182[/ATTACH]</p><p>Faustina I, AD 138-141.</p><p>Roman AR denarius, 3.44 g, 18.7 mm, 7 h.</p><p>Rome, AD 143.</p><p>Obv: DIVA AVG FAVSTINA, bare-headed and draped bust, right.</p><p>Rev: DEDICATIO AEDIS, hexastyle temple on stepped podium, above, a quadriga, Victories as acroteria.</p><p>Refs: RIC 388; BMCRE 306; Cohen 191; Strack 426; RCV 4596; UCR 434; CRE 127.</p><p><br /></p><p>The second type, also issued in AD 143 for the dedication of the temple, bears the reverse inscription PIETAS AVG (BMCRE 319-321) or PIETAS AVGVSTI (<a href="https://research.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1210473&partId=1&searchText=Faustina+322&page=1" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://research.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1210473&partId=1&searchText=Faustina+322&page=1" rel="nofollow">BMCRE 322</a>-323). The former is also known with a veiled bust from the collection in Vienna and cited by Strack (432). I only have the PIETAS AVG version with the bare-headed bust type:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1057185[/ATTACH]</p><p>Faustina I, AD 138-141.</p><p>Roman AR denarius, 3.55 g, 17.4 mm, 7 h.</p><p>Rome, AD 143.</p><p>Obv: DIVA AVG FAVSTINA, bare-headed and draped bust, right.</p><p>Rev: PIETAS AVG, hexastyle temple on stepped podium, above, a quadriga, Victories as acroteria.</p><p>Refs: RIC 396; BMCRE 319-21; Cohen 253; Strack 432; RCV 4599; UCR 435; CRE 129.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 4020458, member: 75937"]An update to the OP. I have since acquired two similar denarii, each issued earlier and for the dedication of the temple in AD 143. The first bears the inscription, DEDICATIO AEDIS ("the dedication of the temple"). It comes in two bust types, one bare-headed and another with a veiled bust, known from only a handful of examples: the Paris specimen cited by Cohen and Strack, and an example in a private collection cited by Temeryazev & Makarenko. An [URL='https://research.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1210487&partId=1&searchText=Faustina+1937,0708.26&page=1']example in the British Museum[/URL] (1937,0708.26) with a veiled bust wearing a stephane is considered to be an ancient forgery made of base metal. My example is, of course, the bare-headed version: [ATTACH=full]1057182[/ATTACH] Faustina I, AD 138-141. Roman AR denarius, 3.44 g, 18.7 mm, 7 h. Rome, AD 143. Obv: DIVA AVG FAVSTINA, bare-headed and draped bust, right. Rev: DEDICATIO AEDIS, hexastyle temple on stepped podium, above, a quadriga, Victories as acroteria. Refs: RIC 388; BMCRE 306; Cohen 191; Strack 426; RCV 4596; UCR 434; CRE 127. The second type, also issued in AD 143 for the dedication of the temple, bears the reverse inscription PIETAS AVG (BMCRE 319-321) or PIETAS AVGVSTI ([URL='https://research.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1210473&partId=1&searchText=Faustina+322&page=1']BMCRE 322[/URL]-323). The former is also known with a veiled bust from the collection in Vienna and cited by Strack (432). I only have the PIETAS AVG version with the bare-headed bust type: [ATTACH=full]1057185[/ATTACH] Faustina I, AD 138-141. Roman AR denarius, 3.55 g, 17.4 mm, 7 h. Rome, AD 143. Obv: DIVA AVG FAVSTINA, bare-headed and draped bust, right. Rev: PIETAS AVG, hexastyle temple on stepped podium, above, a quadriga, Victories as acroteria. Refs: RIC 396; BMCRE 319-21; Cohen 253; Strack 432; RCV 4599; UCR 435; CRE 129.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Latest Faustina Senior is an architectural issue
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...