Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Late Roman fractional denominations
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 2961344, member: 44316"]Yes, that is from the same series. They are often called "quinarii," but without any evidence that is the right name. I have used that name myself. What can you call these unusual small pieces when you don't know their name? My fractions pages discusses that.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The post-reform <b>radiates</b> (mostly CONCORDIA MILITVM) were without silver and therefore worth less than the "aureliani" (often called "antoniniani") they look like, but the <b>folles</b> (nummi) had about the same proportion of silver (some are even marked "XXI") that the pre-reform "aureliani" did, making the follis worth much more than the previous radiates because it is so much larger.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you want to know how they are related, as I wrote on my page, at the end in the references, there are many articles in the literature. Some are deceptively certain they can tell you how many of <i>this</i> denomination are in <i>that</i> denomination, but I assure you there are others who disagree and come up with different numbers.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 2961344, member: 44316"]Yes, that is from the same series. They are often called "quinarii," but without any evidence that is the right name. I have used that name myself. What can you call these unusual small pieces when you don't know their name? My fractions pages discusses that. The post-reform [B]radiates[/B] (mostly CONCORDIA MILITVM) were without silver and therefore worth less than the "aureliani" (often called "antoniniani") they look like, but the [B]folles[/B] (nummi) had about the same proportion of silver (some are even marked "XXI") that the pre-reform "aureliani" did, making the follis worth much more than the previous radiates because it is so much larger. If you want to know how they are related, as I wrote on my page, at the end in the references, there are many articles in the literature. Some are deceptively certain they can tell you how many of [I]this[/I] denomination are in [I]that[/I] denomination, but I assure you there are others who disagree and come up with different numbers.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Late Roman fractional denominations
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...