Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Last coin of 2014: Trajan's Column denarius
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2110811, member: 19463"]Did you notice that each of the three "nice but" examples are struck on slightly oval flans which, had they blank been rotated 90 degrees, would have included the top of the column. It appears that the striker intentionally placed the blanks on the die in horizontal format even though this particular design was extremely vertical. I note that acsearch currently shows about ~20 Trajans with full columns including a really nice one that sold in 2013 for 240 GBP on a 100 GBP estimate. Other than that one, most had other "buts" but the huge numbers of this popular type pretty much guarantee that you will be able to upgrade these spaceholders and send them to Steve. He will need new coins since Bing and I have already started on our journey North to pick through his trash. He won't be able to change his mind and fish them out later. </p><p><br /></p><p>I only buy "but" coins and expect to get a suitable discount for each and every "but". I could have passed up many coins with big problems but that would have meant I never would have had an example of the coin. My most recent is that horrid scab of a doublestrike where it looks like Constantius Gallus was wearing a diadem. There is only one person in the world who finds that interesting and he owns that coin. Dealers who advise against "but" coins are investment counselors not numismatists. You can play different if you never plan to sell your coins. There is nothing wrong with having high standards and buying the finest you can find. Our difference is what we do when the finest available is a "but" like a half dozen of my favorite Septimius Severus denarii which are hard enough to find with multiple "buts". </p><p><br /></p><p> Let me also point out that there are positive "buts". For my Septimius collection, a big positive is "but Martin doesn't have one". The British museum has a denarius I was looking forward to buying "but" it was recognized as Septimius overstruck on Pescennius Niger so it got pulled from the sale it should have been in. Can you imagine both a museum and I preferred a messy coin to a mint state one? Overall my favorite seems to be "but I want it".[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2110811, member: 19463"]Did you notice that each of the three "nice but" examples are struck on slightly oval flans which, had they blank been rotated 90 degrees, would have included the top of the column. It appears that the striker intentionally placed the blanks on the die in horizontal format even though this particular design was extremely vertical. I note that acsearch currently shows about ~20 Trajans with full columns including a really nice one that sold in 2013 for 240 GBP on a 100 GBP estimate. Other than that one, most had other "buts" but the huge numbers of this popular type pretty much guarantee that you will be able to upgrade these spaceholders and send them to Steve. He will need new coins since Bing and I have already started on our journey North to pick through his trash. He won't be able to change his mind and fish them out later. I only buy "but" coins and expect to get a suitable discount for each and every "but". I could have passed up many coins with big problems but that would have meant I never would have had an example of the coin. My most recent is that horrid scab of a doublestrike where it looks like Constantius Gallus was wearing a diadem. There is only one person in the world who finds that interesting and he owns that coin. Dealers who advise against "but" coins are investment counselors not numismatists. You can play different if you never plan to sell your coins. There is nothing wrong with having high standards and buying the finest you can find. Our difference is what we do when the finest available is a "but" like a half dozen of my favorite Septimius Severus denarii which are hard enough to find with multiple "buts". Let me also point out that there are positive "buts". For my Septimius collection, a big positive is "but Martin doesn't have one". The British museum has a denarius I was looking forward to buying "but" it was recognized as Septimius overstruck on Pescennius Niger so it got pulled from the sale it should have been in. Can you imagine both a museum and I preferred a messy coin to a mint state one? Overall my favorite seems to be "but I want it".[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Last coin of 2014: Trajan's Column denarius
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...