Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mr. Flute, post: 1978750, member: 33154&quot;]I agree that &#039;large&#039; fields on coins can be quite nice.</p><p><br /></p><p>I like the 2005 obverse of the Jefferson nickel.&nbsp; It has a nice sized field and is my favorite of the Jefferson obverses.&nbsp; It is infinitely better than the current obverse and nicely &#039;contemporary&#039; as opposed to the 1938-2004 obverse.&nbsp; It&#039;s has a nice balance/ratio of devices to fields and gives the sense of design/composition purpose as opposed to the early seateds without stars, which give an impression of something&#039;s just &#039;missing&#039;.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://static-numista.com/catalogue/photos/etats-unis/g529.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in