Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Large cent, PR or MS?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Leadfoot, post: 1495231, member: 2972"]Compare the strike of the 1846 in this thread to this 1847: </p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://coins.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=1143&lotNo=3032" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://coins.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=1143&lotNo=3032" rel="nofollow">http://coins.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=1143&lotNo=3032</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Or this 1844:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://coins.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=1114&lotNo=1518#39483948978" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://coins.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=1114&lotNo=1518#39483948978" rel="nofollow">http://coins.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=1114&lotNo=1518#39483948978</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Both show more traditional LIBERTY strength you typically see in proofs.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, look at the 1846 N-21 from the Holmes sale:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://images.goldbergauctions.com/php/lot_auc.php?site=1&sale=62&lot=166" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://images.goldbergauctions.com/php/lot_auc.php?site=1&sale=62&lot=166" rel="nofollow">http://images.goldbergauctions.com/php/lot_auc.php?site=1&sale=62&lot=166</a></p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS called it a proof, but it is clearly not as hammered as the prior two coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, Grellman calls this prooflike rather than proof.</p><p><br /></p><p>So there's clearly some contention on these coins, and the N-1 isn't the only 1846 in which there is. Again, PCGS has seemed to go both ways on these coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you could somehow get that coin into a PR slab, you'd come out smelling like a rose. It's a big gamble though.</p><p><br /></p><p>As an aside, there are some who would argue there really weren't proof coins, per se, from this period, and they should rather be deemed specimen strikes, but that's another discussion....Mike[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Leadfoot, post: 1495231, member: 2972"]Compare the strike of the 1846 in this thread to this 1847: [url]http://coins.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=1143&lotNo=3032[/url] Or this 1844: [url]http://coins.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=1114&lotNo=1518#39483948978[/url] Both show more traditional LIBERTY strength you typically see in proofs. However, look at the 1846 N-21 from the Holmes sale: [url]http://images.goldbergauctions.com/php/lot_auc.php?site=1&sale=62&lot=166[/url] PCGS called it a proof, but it is clearly not as hammered as the prior two coins. However, Grellman calls this prooflike rather than proof. So there's clearly some contention on these coins, and the N-1 isn't the only 1846 in which there is. Again, PCGS has seemed to go both ways on these coins. If you could somehow get that coin into a PR slab, you'd come out smelling like a rose. It's a big gamble though. As an aside, there are some who would argue there really weren't proof coins, per se, from this period, and they should rather be deemed specimen strikes, but that's another discussion....Mike[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Large cent, PR or MS?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...