Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;philologus_1, post: 4032605, member: 92212&quot;]Thanks for the input! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>I just examined it closely under the scope, while also ever-so-lightly scraping away some surrounding sediment. The result is that it seems to be just as you marked it in red on the image: an inverted &#039;V&#039;.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>However, there is no conjoined &#039;T&#039; to the left, no symmetrical upside down &#039;V&#039; to the left which would make an &#039;M&#039;, no bottom connecting line to make it a Delta, and in fact nothing on either side. It seems to be a stand alone upside down V.&nbsp;&nbsp; I&#039;d be quite shocked if it were an unpublished monogram, so I&#039;m going to chalk this up as undetermined.</p><p><br /></p><p>In case anyone is interested in seeing the possibilities which SC includes:</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; [ATTACH=full]1059507[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in