Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 2135353, member: 4920&quot;]They say possession is 9/10ths of the law. I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve heard that, but it&#039;s on the nose, in that it creates that compelling of a presumption of ownership. Thus, the ring on your finger is presumed to be yours. I&#039;m saying it&#039;s mine, I&#039;m the one with the burden of persuasion, coming forward with a requisite quantum of evidence to rebut the presumption. </p><p><br /></p><p>The Government has the burden of proof, and that never changes. The burden of coming forward does change. I think in this case it&#039;s incumbent on the Langbord&#039;s to come forward and show they obtained them lawfully, simply because there&#039;s a compelling presumption the Mint never let any of these go. Read the Dissent, and I trust you&#039;ll see that.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in