Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2135209, member: 28107&quot;]If the coins were acquired illegally, the Langbords never acquired a cognizable legal interest in the pieces regardless of whether there was a judicial adjudication at the time or not.&nbsp; So it doesn&#039;t matter whether there was an adjudication.&nbsp; The judicial finding that the pieces did not belong to the Langbords relates back to the time the coins were unlawfully acquired.&nbsp; That is why I see your argument as flawed.&nbsp; CAFRA applies to forfeiture cases.&nbsp; You must have a legally recognized interest in order for you to forfeit it.&nbsp; Another way of looking at this is that all forfeitures involve seizures but not all seizures are forfeitures.&nbsp; Put yet another way, the declaratory judgment did not affect the rights of the parties per se; rather it merely declared what already was.</p><p><br /></p><p>And if the Langbords did legally acquire the pieces, CAFRA is moot.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in