Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Langbord's Win!!!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 2135161, member: 66"]Key phrase "IF the coins were stolen". I'm sorry we don't KNOW if they were stolen, and there was no legal decision at the time of the seizure that they coins had been stolen. Your initial sentence is flawed. A more accurate analogy would be a neighborhood kid is found in possession of a car. I claim the car is mine but I have no title or registration for it. Are you saying that until it can be researched and proved whether or not the car actually belongs to me the kid has no interest in the car? I say he does have an interest until it can be proven he doesn't</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>But filing the suit under CAFRA required a response from the government within 90 days or the coins had to be returned and the matter dropped. The government didn't respond so the appeals court says the coins should have been (and must be ) returned, there should have been no court case so there is no decision that the coins were stolen. The government couldn't have proven that they were stolen and that CAFRA didn't apply before the 90 day deadline, so they needed to file the forfeiture proceedings so they could continue holding the coins while they developed their case. But they didn't so under CAFRA they lost.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 2135161, member: 66"]Key phrase "IF the coins were stolen". I'm sorry we don't KNOW if they were stolen, and there was no legal decision at the time of the seizure that they coins had been stolen. Your initial sentence is flawed. A more accurate analogy would be a neighborhood kid is found in possession of a car. I claim the car is mine but I have no title or registration for it. Are you saying that until it can be researched and proved whether or not the car actually belongs to me the kid has no interest in the car? I say he does have an interest until it can be proven he doesn't But filing the suit under CAFRA required a response from the government within 90 days or the coins had to be returned and the matter dropped. The government didn't respond so the appeals court says the coins should have been (and must be ) returned, there should have been no court case so there is no decision that the coins were stolen. The government couldn't have proven that they were stolen and that CAFRA didn't apply before the 90 day deadline, so they needed to file the forfeiture proceedings so they could continue holding the coins while they developed their case. But they didn't so under CAFRA they lost.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Langbord's Win!!!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...