Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Conder101, post: 2134586, member: 66&quot;]OK, the Lanbords had an interest in the property because they had them in their possession.&nbsp; At the time the government seized them the government felt they belonged to them but no legal decision to that effect had ever been reached.&nbsp; Until they are proven to be stolen the Lanbords did potentially have a legally recognizable claim to them so the forfeiture law would apply.&nbsp; And the trial court decision came AFTER the forfeiture should have been filed and after (according to the appeals court decision) the coins should have been returned to the Lanbords.&nbsp; That was why the appeals court vacated the other court decision.&nbsp; The trial should have never taken place so in the current eyes of the law it&#039;s decision also does not exist.&nbsp; So in the eyes of the law there is still no legal decision that the coins were stolen and are the property of the government.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in