Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;MKent, post: 2484819, member: 33625&quot;]Let me see if I understand. In order to get the 1933&#039;s they exchanged older gold of the same face and bullion value for them? Obviously with malice, although I&#039;m not accusing just an assumption. So they paid for the coins in question even though the coins shouldn&#039;t have been available for exchange. If that is the case then they could be entitled to reimbursement of the bullion value of the coins if there was no malicious intent in the beginning which would be hard to prove, and if the mint made these coins available to them for exchange even malice would be hard to prove. Thus the family could say it&#039;s just an honest mistake on the Governments part by giving us the coins in the first place and we feel we should be reimbursed the value of the coins exchanged at today&#039;s market&nbsp; value along with the expense of the safe deposit box we used to safely store them as well as any time and effort put into to returning them to the FBI or whomever they returned them to. Right or Wrong?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in