Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Langbord-Switt 1933 Double Eagle Case
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="scottishmoney, post: 2484542, member: 12789"]Inasmuch as this thread has taken an unfortunate political bend, I only hope that the coins will be preserved. </p><p><br /></p><p>That said, Izzy Switt was obviously even less than shady in his dealings, all the while assisted by a corrupt mint employee who had the fortune of not being found out beyond a reasonable doubt withing his lifetime.</p><p><br /></p><p>When the family came forward with the coins, I believe it was more for personal gain - greed and the hopes of somehow 80+ years after their less than savory departure from the mint, that they would somehow find that time had erased the crime of their predecessor so that the coins could have mystically been legal to sell at a usurious profit. There are times whence one is perhaps better to keep mum about such matters and quietly stash something away. Now the Langbord family is less the coins, and more importantly less the egregious and untoward legal fees.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is whispering of an appeal to the SCOTUS - but I cannot imagine a precedent which would permit the court even hearing this case.</p><p><br /></p><p>Then another thought, what if in some wild thought, the US mint decided to recover the 1913 Liberty nickels - made illegally by an employee in the mint and illegally removed and quietly hidden until the 1920s?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="scottishmoney, post: 2484542, member: 12789"]Inasmuch as this thread has taken an unfortunate political bend, I only hope that the coins will be preserved. That said, Izzy Switt was obviously even less than shady in his dealings, all the while assisted by a corrupt mint employee who had the fortune of not being found out beyond a reasonable doubt withing his lifetime. When the family came forward with the coins, I believe it was more for personal gain - greed and the hopes of somehow 80+ years after their less than savory departure from the mint, that they would somehow find that time had erased the crime of their predecessor so that the coins could have mystically been legal to sell at a usurious profit. There are times whence one is perhaps better to keep mum about such matters and quietly stash something away. Now the Langbord family is less the coins, and more importantly less the egregious and untoward legal fees. There is whispering of an appeal to the SCOTUS - but I cannot imagine a precedent which would permit the court even hearing this case. Then another thought, what if in some wild thought, the US mint decided to recover the 1913 Liberty nickels - made illegally by an employee in the mint and illegally removed and quietly hidden until the 1920s?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Langbord-Switt 1933 Double Eagle Case
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...