Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mlov43, post: 2483497, member: 16729&quot;]From the text of the ruling:</p><p><i>&#039;Not surprisingly, the jury in this case heard no testimony from anyone who was actually present at the Mint when the ‘33 Double Eagles first disappeared so many years ago – all the primary actors who might have told that tale have passed away. But that certainly does not doom the Government’s case because “explicit evidence is not required to support a finding of specific intent.” &#039;</i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p>So the government does NOT need testimony to support their case (and in this case, &quot;specific intent&quot;).&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Interesting.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in