Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 2136594, member: 4920&quot;]Conder, here&#039;s your statement I replied to, emphasis, supplied...</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s the Third Circuit Opinion, emphasis, supplied...</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;<i><b>One 1933 double eagle was </b></i><b><i>sold to King Farouk</i></b> of Egypt, a coin collector, in 1944. <i><b>This coin had been</b></i> <b><i>unlawfully smuggled out of the Mint</i></b> [...].&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>In your words, the Farouk coin was a Switt coin. In the Third Circuit&#039;s words, the Farouk coin was unlawfully smuggled out of the Mint. Switt sold the coin, which was unlawfully smuggled out of the Mint, to Farouk. Switt was either somehow involved in the smuggling, or, at the very least, was in receipt of the smuggled coins, and that&#039;s what the District Court jury found. What, about that, do you fail to comprehend?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in