Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Conder101, post: 1724204, member: 66&quot;]I think it is because most collectors pay more attention to the obverses.&nbsp; They are studied more while the reverses are often just given a cursory glance.&nbsp; Think about the WAM cents.&nbsp; The 1998 is by far the most common of the three but it was not discovered until 2000, and then the 2000 and the 1999 were turned up.&nbsp; Most people who look for WAM&#039;s only look at those three years, even though the same mix-up that created the WAM&#039;s in those years could have occurred in any year from 1994 to 2008, and could also have happened to Denver from 1994 to 1996.&nbsp; Do WAM&#039;s exist in those years?&nbsp; So far none are known, but very few people are looking too.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in