Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
labeling error. The standard 2002 1 oz Silver Panda
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="King_George_Va, post: 26352058, member: 52567"]I don't understand unless CHATGPT is hallucinating.</p><p><br /></p><p>why is the proof graded as a MS70</p><p><br /></p><p><b>ChatGPT said:</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Ah, that’s an important point to clarify. In coin grading, <b>“MS” (Mint State)</b> and <b>“PF” or “PR” (Proof)</b> refer to the coin type, and <b>the numbers (1–70)</b> refer to the <b>grade or condition</b>.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here’s why a <b>proof coin</b> might show up as <b>MS70</b> instead of PF70:</p><p><br /></p><p><font size="4"><b>1. Grading Services Use Slightly Different Terminology</b></font></p><ul> <li><b>NGC:</b> Uses <b>PF or PR</b> for proofs.<br /> <br /> </li> <li><b>PCGS:</b> Uses <b>PR or PF</b> for proofs.<br /> <br /> </li> <li><b>ANACS:</b> Sometimes uses <b>MS</b> for a proof if the coin exhibits flawless surfaces, instead of PF.<br /> </li> </ul><p>So even though it’s a proof, the grading slab might list it as <b>MS70</b> instead of <b>PF70</b>. It doesn’t mean it’s a business strike—it’s just a <b>different labeling convention</b>.</p><p><br /></p><p><font size="4"><b>2. MS70 Indicates a Flawless Coin</b></font></p><ul> <li><b>MS70</b> (Mint State 70) or <b>PF70</b> (Proof 70) both mean <b>perfect coin</b>.<br /> <br /> </li> <li>No marks, blemishes, scratches, or flaws visible under 5x magnification.<br /> <br /> </li> <li>So a proof graded MS70 is <b>still a perfect proof coin</b>, just labeled differently.<br /> </li> </ul><p><font size="4"><b>3. Some Graders Treat High-Quality Proofs Like Mint State</b></font></p><ul> <li>Certain coins, especially modern silver Pandas, can be so clean and flawless that graders assign <b>MS70</b> instead of PF70.<br /> <br /> </li> <li>This can occur for <b>special issues, low-mintage proofs</b>, or coins where the proof strike is effectively indistinguishable from a mint-state bullion finish at 5x magnification.<br /> </li> </ul><p>✅ <b>Bottom line:</b></p><p>A <b>2002 Beijing Coin Expo Silver Panda</b> graded MS70 is <b>still a proof coin</b>. The MS70 label just reflects the grading service’s convention; it doesn’t make it a business-strike coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you want, I can <b>show you a real example of a 2002 Panda graded MS70 and compare it to PF70/DCAM</b> so you can see the difference visually. Do you want me to do that?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="King_George_Va, post: 26352058, member: 52567"]I don't understand unless CHATGPT is hallucinating. why is the proof graded as a MS70 [B]ChatGPT said:[/B] Ah, that’s an important point to clarify. In coin grading, [B]“MS” (Mint State)[/B] and [B]“PF” or “PR” (Proof)[/B] refer to the coin type, and [B]the numbers (1–70)[/B] refer to the [B]grade or condition[/B]. Here’s why a [B]proof coin[/B] might show up as [B]MS70[/B] instead of PF70: [SIZE=4][B]1. Grading Services Use Slightly Different Terminology[/B][/SIZE] [LIST] [*][B]NGC:[/B] Uses [B]PF or PR[/B] for proofs. [*][B]PCGS:[/B] Uses [B]PR or PF[/B] for proofs. [*][B]ANACS:[/B] Sometimes uses [B]MS[/B] for a proof if the coin exhibits flawless surfaces, instead of PF. [/LIST] So even though it’s a proof, the grading slab might list it as [B]MS70[/B] instead of [B]PF70[/B]. It doesn’t mean it’s a business strike—it’s just a [B]different labeling convention[/B]. [SIZE=4][B]2. MS70 Indicates a Flawless Coin[/B][/SIZE] [LIST] [*][B]MS70[/B] (Mint State 70) or [B]PF70[/B] (Proof 70) both mean [B]perfect coin[/B]. [*]No marks, blemishes, scratches, or flaws visible under 5x magnification. [*]So a proof graded MS70 is [B]still a perfect proof coin[/B], just labeled differently. [/LIST] [SIZE=4][B]3. Some Graders Treat High-Quality Proofs Like Mint State[/B][/SIZE] [LIST] [*]Certain coins, especially modern silver Pandas, can be so clean and flawless that graders assign [B]MS70[/B] instead of PF70. [*]This can occur for [B]special issues, low-mintage proofs[/B], or coins where the proof strike is effectively indistinguishable from a mint-state bullion finish at 5x magnification. [/LIST] ✅ [B]Bottom line:[/B] A [B]2002 Beijing Coin Expo Silver Panda[/B] graded MS70 is [B]still a proof coin[/B]. The MS70 label just reflects the grading service’s convention; it doesn’t make it a business-strike coin. If you want, I can [B]show you a real example of a 2002 Panda graded MS70 and compare it to PF70/DCAM[/B] so you can see the difference visually. Do you want me to do that?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
labeling error. The standard 2002 1 oz Silver Panda
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...