Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Drusus, post: 210830, member: 6370&quot;]<span style="color: black">well, competition is always good so there is nothing wrong with it, I DO think its just another version of wiki though (even in its appearance)...it doesnt really offer much that is new or different. </span></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: black">That article is a bit misleading in a way. Sure someone on wiki can change something you wrote but that doesnt mean it will stay that way. If it is indeed a fix, addition of improvement, then that is for the good I would think and Previous versions are save and can be reinstituted if need be and I think our friend aiden knows full well from experience that wiki is policed and you cannot vandalize articles or write biased diatribes without repercussions.</span></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: black">The one thing I do like about it is that they will have so called experts. This will be good when it comes to complicated and technical things but when it comes to more subjective subjects, experts often disagree so that is a whole new problematic ball of wax. I also like the use of real names but then again I have my real name on wiki in my photo contributions and if I wanted to I could have used my real name when registering and people can see I am the one who created the articles I created. I don’t think it will stop people from vadalizing articles though. So I will probably continue using and contributing to wiki…It has it flaws but studies have shown that although often the articles have a few more mistakes than, say, an encyclopedia, they also show that the articles there include far more information than all encyclopedias…sooo…I like.</span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in