Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Known Provenance and Legality of Owning 1933 Double Eagles
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2905783, member: 112"]I pretty much thought that just about everybody was well aware that pictures of coins can hide and or show things that cannot be seen in other pictures of the exact same coin. I mean it's downright commonplace that you see this. Even when people post multiple pics of their coins here on CT it's common to see this or that, or not see this or that, in one pic or the other.</p><p><br /></p><p>I've probably posted these pics at least 20 times in various threads as examples of just how different a tiny, tiny change in the angle of the lighting can make a coin look. I took both sets of these pictures only minutes apart. I did not move the camera, and did not change even a single setting on the camera when I did so. The only thing I did was to lift the lights and this much - l ...... l - literally the space between those 2 lines, about a half an inch. This is the outcome that tiny change produced.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]700916[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]700917[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]700918[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]700919[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Now if a tiny change in the angle of lighting can produce differences like that in how a coin looks, try and imagine just how much different - using different lights, different camera settings, different angles of lights, camera and coin, even different cameras - can make a coin look.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2905783, member: 112"]I pretty much thought that just about everybody was well aware that pictures of coins can hide and or show things that cannot be seen in other pictures of the exact same coin. I mean it's downright commonplace that you see this. Even when people post multiple pics of their coins here on CT it's common to see this or that, or not see this or that, in one pic or the other. I've probably posted these pics at least 20 times in various threads as examples of just how different a tiny, tiny change in the angle of the lighting can make a coin look. I took both sets of these pictures only minutes apart. I did not move the camera, and did not change even a single setting on the camera when I did so. The only thing I did was to lift the lights and this much - l ...... l - literally the space between those 2 lines, about a half an inch. This is the outcome that tiny change produced. [ATTACH=full]700916[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]700917[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]700918[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]700919[/ATTACH] Now if a tiny change in the angle of lighting can produce differences like that in how a coin looks, try and imagine just how much different - using different lights, different camera settings, different angles of lights, camera and coin, even different cameras - can make a coin look.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Known Provenance and Legality of Owning 1933 Double Eagles
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...