Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
King What's-his-face with the pointy beard
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 4095503, member: 81887"]1. The spot on the reverse of my OP coin is a small lump of silvery metal (lighter in color than the coin) that is stuck to the surface of the coin. Possibly solder? Though why someone would get solder on this coin is a bit puzzling- maybe trying to turn the coin into jewelry?</p><p><br /></p><p>2. On your first 63.6 coin, note that the reverse is double-struck (most obvious behind the archer- there are three lines of legend visible instead of the expected two). I think the "extra" line of dots between the folds of the archer's coat is the normal line from the first strike, which survived being obliterated by the second strike due to lucky positioning.</p><p><br /></p><p>3. Interesting. After looking at many photos of 63.6 drachms (in books and online), it appears there are a couple of unlisted sub-varieties here. It is most common for 63.6 to have a single line of dots under the archer's legs (as the remnants of the chair), but a fair number of these coins also feature two dots to either side of the central line dots, which on coins with some wear easily turns into a cross or plus shape. I have no idea why Sellwood doesn't list this as a variety, given that he lists similar variations for some other types (e.g. type 78 drachms). Good catch!</p><p><br /></p><p>4. I think that bronze attribution sounds good. At any rate, in that condition it'd be hard to prove otherwise.</p><p><br /></p><p>5. I agree with all the points you made in your post about the Vonones drachm. I didn't talk about how special Vonones' coins are in my original post because it wasn't related to my main point, though I did discuss the coin in detail when I first got it: <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-parthian-drachm-with-no-archer-on-reverse.299522/#post-2793111" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-parthian-drachm-with-no-archer-on-reverse.299522/#post-2793111">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-parthian-drachm-with-no-archer-on-reverse.299522/#post-2793111</a></p><p><br /></p><p>6. "The more I learn about Parthian coins, the less I know." You and me both, brother. Actually, I think this is true of any area of learning: The more you know, the more you realize you don't know. But the first step in gaining knowledge is to understand that there is something you don't know. I suppose some might find that thought frightening, but I prefer to see it as a challenge.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 4095503, member: 81887"]1. The spot on the reverse of my OP coin is a small lump of silvery metal (lighter in color than the coin) that is stuck to the surface of the coin. Possibly solder? Though why someone would get solder on this coin is a bit puzzling- maybe trying to turn the coin into jewelry? 2. On your first 63.6 coin, note that the reverse is double-struck (most obvious behind the archer- there are three lines of legend visible instead of the expected two). I think the "extra" line of dots between the folds of the archer's coat is the normal line from the first strike, which survived being obliterated by the second strike due to lucky positioning. 3. Interesting. After looking at many photos of 63.6 drachms (in books and online), it appears there are a couple of unlisted sub-varieties here. It is most common for 63.6 to have a single line of dots under the archer's legs (as the remnants of the chair), but a fair number of these coins also feature two dots to either side of the central line dots, which on coins with some wear easily turns into a cross or plus shape. I have no idea why Sellwood doesn't list this as a variety, given that he lists similar variations for some other types (e.g. type 78 drachms). Good catch! 4. I think that bronze attribution sounds good. At any rate, in that condition it'd be hard to prove otherwise. 5. I agree with all the points you made in your post about the Vonones drachm. I didn't talk about how special Vonones' coins are in my original post because it wasn't related to my main point, though I did discuss the coin in detail when I first got it: [URL]https://www.cointalk.com/threads/a-parthian-drachm-with-no-archer-on-reverse.299522/#post-2793111[/URL] 6. "The more I learn about Parthian coins, the less I know." You and me both, brother. Actually, I think this is true of any area of learning: The more you know, the more you realize you don't know. But the first step in gaining knowledge is to understand that there is something you don't know. I suppose some might find that thought frightening, but I prefer to see it as a challenge.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
King What's-his-face with the pointy beard
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...