Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;+VGO.DVCKS, post: 7436755, member: 110504&quot;]Wow.&nbsp; With the lack of detail on the crown, which is one primary way to identify &#039;classes&#039; (Britspeak for variants and subvariants), and the state of the mint signature (upper left on the reverse), I&#039;m clearly out of my league.&nbsp; From here, the moneyer (from the upper right on the reverse) is looking like a variant of &#039;WILLELM.&#039;&nbsp; We&#039;re out of luck there, too, because moneyers with that name are thick as flies, from one mint (and class) to the next.</p><p>More impressionistically, the portrait style does look earlier than Henry III (son of John, who continued the type).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in