Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Numbers, post: 2486811, member: 11668&quot;]Yes, those are definitely a strange case.&nbsp; There&#039;s no apparent difference between the 2006 and 2006A $100&#039;s, either.</p><p><br /></p><p>Neither the 2006 $100 nor the 2009 $100 actually ran out of serial numbers (indeed, the 2009 $100 had a fairly small printage by $100 standards), but it&#039;s possible that the BEP&#039;s decision to change the series designation when production resumed was motivated by a desire to avoid running out of serial numbers for the New York district.&nbsp; Series 2006 and 2006A, combined, included far more New York notes than could be numbered in a single series.&nbsp; And Series 2009 and 2009A, combined, are only 51.2 million notes (less than one month&#039;s typical production) away from reaching that point.</p><p><br /></p><p>In general, though, series designations are just getting weird lately.&nbsp; See the two different $5 series that were both labelled Series 2006, for example....&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in