Kennedy halves with identical marks

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by igotchange, Oct 17, 2020.

  1. igotchange

    igotchange Active Member

    IMG_20201016_151530.jpg Can one of you yeenius's tell me how these halves get this same damage in same place from diff mintages?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 17, 2020
    capthank likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Where are you, ?
     
  4. igotchange

    igotchange Active Member

    Rite heya los Angeles
     
  5. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    OK. I meant in the forum
     
  6. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Hey.. You just hijacked somone elses thread with a question that has nothing to do with the original coin in question. You need to start your own separate thread. [Edit- the off-topic posts have now been moved to their own thread. ~Mod]

    Your coin is damaged Anyway.
    That is not a mint error of any kind.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 17, 2020
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  7. igotchange

    igotchange Active Member

    At the mint maybe but thanks anyway.didnt meen to hijack.
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  8. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    That does not occur at the US Mint. Someone was bored and altered your Halves after they left the Mint.
     
    Oldhoopster, ZoidMeister and l.cutler like this.
  9. igotchange

    igotchange Active Member

    If you'll notice all the coins have the same mechanical damage in the same location on all coins regardless of year minted.my hunch is its from some part of the minting process.macine failure of some nature.what makes you so positive that it cant be mint related.do you work on mint machines?
     
  10. igotchange

    igotchange Active Member

    Hey paddy long time.thanks for your input.stay healthy.
     
  11. l.cutler

    l.cutler Member

    Definitely post mint damage. One doesn't have to work on machines at the mint to understand the minting process.
     
    Oldhoopster and SensibleSal66 like this.
  12. John Burgess

    John Burgess Well-Known Member

    A. A coin rolling machine jammed them and marked them. (Unlikely)

    B. A person wacked them in those locations to mark them. (Likely)
     
    ZoidMeister likes this.
  13. Oldhoopster

    Oldhoopster Member of the ANA since 1982

    The minting and die making process is well documented and many numismatists and error specialists have studied it and understand it. The US mint has some videos and there have been numerous good reference links posted on here over the years.

    The reason these members can be so sure that this didn't happen at the mint is they know and understand the minting process and have demonstrated that knowledge through their posts on this site over the years.

    There are countless ways for coins to get damaged after they leave the mint. In order to say it's a mint error, you have to explain how this could happen during the minting process. I can see where your hunch might seem to make sense, but if you take the time to learn and understand the minting process, it will be easy to see that this couldn't happen at the mint.

    Hope this helps
     
    igotchange likes this.
  14. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    They all fell into the clutches of the same bored person, who used the same tool to inflict the same damage on each of them.
     
    ZoidMeister likes this.
  15. Scuba4fun777

    Scuba4fun777 Well-Known Member

    Nice!
    These are a very rare error, indeed. The indentations were made by a machine called the ‘Devil’s Claw’. It’s usually kept at the Denver Mint, but has been occasionally used in Philly, too. It’s used to randomly test the hardness of a finished coin. Most coins pass with ease, however some do fail and the failed coins are supposed to be rejected. Apparently, the coins you have did fail and somehow made it into circulation.
    Maybe I should have waited until April 1 to share this. The OP wanted an answer...
     
  16. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Very interesting analogy Scuba4fun777. Thanks for the post igotchange.
     
  17. Scuba4fun777

    Scuba4fun777 Well-Known Member

    In all seriousness, these marks are considered PMD, or post mint damage - even if for some strange reason they were added at the mint.
    Why? Because someone could easily add these indentations and there would be almost no way to determine if they were added at the mint or afterwards.
     
  18. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Sorry, I'm going to have to cite you for a violation of the law.

    (I know there'll be somebody who quits reading before the last line, or decides that that's the part that wasn't serious...)
     
    Scuba4fun777 likes this.
  19. Silverpop

    Silverpop Well-Known Member

    Nothing Important or special about those marks

    as others have said PMD
     
  20. ZoidMeister

    ZoidMeister Hamlet Squire of Tomfoolery . . . . .

    Delusions of grandeur of perceived findings amongst budding numistmatists seems to be a bigger contagion than the virus we are all cowering in fear of . . . .

    Z
     
  21. igotchange

    igotchange Active Member

    May you receive nitrogen narcosis for x mas my good man brought on from escaping the clutches of a rabid starfish.
     
    ZoidMeister and Scuba4fun777 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page