Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;WingedLiberty, post: 1305485, member: 26030&quot;]Great posts and answers GBouton and Georgio!&nbsp; I think you hit the nail on the head -- that actually makes sense to me.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Although I have to admit as a kid collector of Kennedy Halfs back then, the 1968-D was no more special to me than the 1967 or the 1969-D. Though I can see how the movement of the mintmark from the reverse to the obverse in 1968 might have tickled someones fancy -- and there was that 4 year gap in&nbsp; D mint kennedy&#039;s from 1964 to 1968.&nbsp; 1968 also started a short P mint gap.&nbsp; To me the biggest news of 1968 was the restarting of the Proof Sets and the S mint Kennedy&#039;s.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Georgio, fantastic MS67 Kennedy!!! That is gorgeous!!!!!!!!&nbsp; Thanks for posting that. </p><p><br /></p><p>Also on your population reports, that&#039;s really interesting.&nbsp; So the MS66 1969-D is ONLY 3 times rarer than the MS66 1968-D (1968-D population of 284 coins, 1969-D population of 92 coins) ... which does not justify a 20x price difference!</p><p><br /></p><p>Investor Alert!!! ... Buy all the PCGS graded MS66 1968-D Kennedy&#039;s you can find at $12 ... They seem to me to be a near sure bet to go up in value.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Based on the statistics, I would guess fair market value of the PCGS MS66 1968-D should be closer to $90 (or 1/3rd of the value of the MS66 1969-D) rather than $12.&nbsp; (By the way, I am guessing things are running in this direction rather than the other way, where all other MS66 Kennedy&#039;s are overpriced since it&#039;s the singular 1968-D that is the outlier here.&nbsp; Then again who knows, maybe all the other dates ARE overpriced!)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in