Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Kenndy Comparison - 1964 to 2009
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="19Lyds, post: 638499, member: 15929"]The Kennedy Portrait has undergone some slight yet significant changes over the years which can be spotted by comparing the original 1964 design with some from 2000 or later as the OP has done.</p><p> </p><p>In a nutshell, the US Mint made a transistion to spaghetti hair in 1991 which, through later refinements and de-reliefing, ended up in reducing the size of Kennedy's head in 1995. I'm not saying that the spaghetti hair is the cause of the change in size, just that 1991 had a major change in how the hair was portrayed. I believe the design changes were dictated by having to reduce the overall relief which then enabled the use of high speed presses with a minimum of striking errors. (Dang!)</p><p> </p><p>The easiest method, for me, in determining the size of the portrait is to look at where the lowest point of the bust falls in relationship to the 9 in the date. It then becomes obvious that some reduction has occured both in relief and relative size. The coin has gone from a coin-like appearance to that of a simple medal or medallion.</p><p> </p><p><img src="http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f351/19Lyds/Kennedy/KennedyThenandNow-D.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="19Lyds, post: 638499, member: 15929"]The Kennedy Portrait has undergone some slight yet significant changes over the years which can be spotted by comparing the original 1964 design with some from 2000 or later as the OP has done. In a nutshell, the US Mint made a transistion to spaghetti hair in 1991 which, through later refinements and de-reliefing, ended up in reducing the size of Kennedy's head in 1995. I'm not saying that the spaghetti hair is the cause of the change in size, just that 1991 had a major change in how the hair was portrayed. I believe the design changes were dictated by having to reduce the overall relief which then enabled the use of high speed presses with a minimum of striking errors. (Dang!) The easiest method, for me, in determining the size of the portrait is to look at where the lowest point of the bust falls in relationship to the 9 in the date. It then becomes obvious that some reduction has occured both in relief and relative size. The coin has gone from a coin-like appearance to that of a simple medal or medallion. [IMG]http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f351/19Lyds/Kennedy/KennedyThenandNow-D.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Kenndy Comparison - 1964 to 2009
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...