Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Justinian, and the Sufferings of the City of God
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Tejas, post: 7943748, member: 84905"]Yale historian Paul Freedman compared Justinian with Stalin, arguing that the two had a lot in common. The sources on Justinian are very scant and largely limited to one author, Procopius.</p><p><br /></p><p>Procopius wrote several works on Justinian's reign, including, on the one hand, the "Wars" and "Buildings" - in which he portrays Justinian as a caring ruler, who emersed himself in every detail of government, religion, architecture and art - and, on the other hand, the "Secret history" which is a diatribe against Justinian and his court.</p><p><br /></p><p>"Wars" and "Buildings" were published in Procopius' lifetime. These works represented the official line, including the expected adoration of Justinian and the personallity cult that he had created.</p><p><br /></p><p>The "Secret history", however, was to be published after Procopius was safely dead. In it, Procopius released all his anger and hatred of Justinian, portraying him as a brutal, decadent and largely incompent ruler, who devastated the empire to satisfy his own grandure.</p><p><br /></p><p>Historians have long struggled to reconcile the two different portrayals of Justinian. Some even argued that Procopius may have gone mad between writing the different works. However, we now know that Procopius worked in parallel on the favourable and the condeming works.</p><p><br /></p><p>Indeed, it is not so difficult to reconcile the different views. The same happened during Stalin's reign (Hitler would be another example). Many who praised Stalin according to the official line, secretly knew and sometimes wrote that he really was a villain and certainly proclaimed that much after his death. </p><p><br /></p><p>This is probably also what we see in Procopius. To have the long life, which he enjoyed he had to stick to the official line during his lifetime, but he did leave us with an account of the true Justinian, which he reserved for the time after his own death. </p><p><br /></p><p>Hence, Justinian was probably a bit like Stalin or Hitler and it is only thanks to Procopius' "Secret history", which survived in only one single manuscript that we know this truth.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Tejas, post: 7943748, member: 84905"]Yale historian Paul Freedman compared Justinian with Stalin, arguing that the two had a lot in common. The sources on Justinian are very scant and largely limited to one author, Procopius. Procopius wrote several works on Justinian's reign, including, on the one hand, the "Wars" and "Buildings" - in which he portrays Justinian as a caring ruler, who emersed himself in every detail of government, religion, architecture and art - and, on the other hand, the "Secret history" which is a diatribe against Justinian and his court. "Wars" and "Buildings" were published in Procopius' lifetime. These works represented the official line, including the expected adoration of Justinian and the personallity cult that he had created. The "Secret history", however, was to be published after Procopius was safely dead. In it, Procopius released all his anger and hatred of Justinian, portraying him as a brutal, decadent and largely incompent ruler, who devastated the empire to satisfy his own grandure. Historians have long struggled to reconcile the two different portrayals of Justinian. Some even argued that Procopius may have gone mad between writing the different works. However, we now know that Procopius worked in parallel on the favourable and the condeming works. Indeed, it is not so difficult to reconcile the different views. The same happened during Stalin's reign (Hitler would be another example). Many who praised Stalin according to the official line, secretly knew and sometimes wrote that he really was a villain and certainly proclaimed that much after his death. This is probably also what we see in Procopius. To have the long life, which he enjoyed he had to stick to the official line during his lifetime, but he did leave us with an account of the true Justinian, which he reserved for the time after his own death. Hence, Justinian was probably a bit like Stalin or Hitler and it is only thanks to Procopius' "Secret history", which survived in only one single manuscript that we know this truth.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Justinian, and the Sufferings of the City of God
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...