Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 1435255, member: 37839&quot;][ATTACH]175914.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]175915.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]175916.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;Left to right: MS 63&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; MS 64&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Ms 65</p><p><br /></p><p>According to PCGS Standards---not my rubrics, but from their grading of obverses on Morgans.&nbsp; Notice that even the &#039;65s have a fair amount of contact marks, nicks and spots.&nbsp; They get fewer and fewer as one goes up the grade, but do not disappear until the 66-67 range.&nbsp; So, I think my original premise was pretty correct, if we are using the obverse as the point of discussion.&nbsp; The reverses are similar, and can be posted as well. 63s are as a rule, quite baggy.&nbsp; 64s are still pretty baggy, and 65s exhibit some &quot;noise,&quot; just less of it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in