Just got this 1970 half Kennedy. Advertised as silver GEM.

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Djjohnson1019, Mar 31, 2020.

  1. Djjohnson1019

    Djjohnson1019 New Member

    Should i be concern about these marks, and what are they? Thanks for your help.
     

    Attached Files:

    capthank likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Jeffjay

    Jeffjay Well-Known Member

    If you don't like the looks of it you should be concerned . I never buy coins that can't be returned .
     
    wxcoin and LA_Geezer like this.
  4. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    That's an impaired proof. Silver? yes. Gem? No. Though, to be fair, "gem" isn't a recognized grade and is more in the eyes of the beholder. In this case, it was probably just used to sell a piece of junk silver for more than it was worth. Just my 2c.
     
    Cheech9712, wxcoin, Dynoking and 4 others like this.
  5. Djjohnson1019

    Djjohnson1019 New Member

    Ty. Think ill try a return
     
    Inspector43 likes this.
  6. Clawcoins

    Clawcoins Damaging Coins Daily

    I'd return it. looks aweful.
     
    KevinM, Mountain Man, wxcoin and 3 others like this.
  7. bud250r

    bud250r Active Member

    Return it if you can. There are a lot better looking examples out there, and they are not expensive.
     
    Djjohnson1019 and Inspector43 like this.
  8. Maxfli

    Maxfli Well-Known Member

  9. Djjohnson1019

    Djjohnson1019 New Member

    Ty all for your help.
     
  10. medoraman

    medoraman Well-Known Member

    Is it the photos? Looks like toning mostly. Toning on proofs of that era will look streaky sometimes.
     
  11. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    There are definitely lots of scratches in the field on the obverse.
     
  12. medoraman

    medoraman Well-Known Member

    I would you are most likely right. I didn't know if the OP was talking about that or the streaky toning. These planchets in the 60s and 70s for some reason imparted streaky toning many times.

    I think you confused me when you said impaired proof. I thought impaired always meant circulated. I would label this a scratched proof.
     
    furryfrog02 likes this.
  13. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    It's supposed to be a proof. If you don't like the looks of it, send it back. It has always been my opinion that if you don't like a coin at first, you will never change.
     
  14. medoraman

    medoraman Well-Known Member

    I agree. The old saying is that if you do not love the coin at first sight, you will never like the coin long term.
     
    Cheech9712, Jeffjay and UncleScroge like this.
  15. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    A mishandled proof...has no value above melt...return it!
     
    Cheech9712 likes this.
  16. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    They are impaired proofs but they do have silver in them. Return of you can.
     
  17. Greg Bayes

    Greg Bayes Where's the loo?

    I would have to return that coin. All too many Bay sellers describe their coins as gem or such silliness as gem au ++. Ask them before you buy, how did you arrive at your classification"?
     
  18. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    It wasn't hard!
    TON 80 IN DARTS.jpg
     
    Cheech9712, gronnh20 and Greg Bayes like this.
  19. Gallienus

    Gallienus coinsandhistory.com

    Looks like a bit of PVC damage on a proof. Not really scratches I guess?
     
    Cheech9712 likes this.
  20. Jeffjay

    Jeffjay Well-Known Member

    Depending on what you paid and if the seller offers free shipping returns it may be better to keep it as a reminder to not ever be in a hurry to buy coins. I think most collectors have a few coins like that.
     
    Cheech9712 and furryfrog02 like this.
  21. robec

    robec Junior Member

    The 1970-S Proof Kennedy is 40% silver. I don't know how much you paid, but you can get a much nicer, problem free coin at little cost........$10-$20 already graded.
     
    ldhair and chascat like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page