Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2178574, member: 28107&quot;]The Langboard case is distinguishable because of the CAFRA claim and the deadline issue.&nbsp; Anything else is meaningless dicta and has no precedential value.&nbsp; If the government authorized the release to employees through the cashier (either the 1933 Double Eagle or the 1964-D Peace Dollar), then the pieces were released and the government has no claim to the property.&nbsp; And the statutes concerning seizure and forfeiture (read as those that the government could use to take back the property and deny title to the current owner) would be inapplicable.&nbsp; So again, the question is one that is highly fact dependent and one for a fact finder, which means that it is not &quot;unambiguously illegal&quot; as you contended.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in