Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Just got the elusive 1916 Barber Half....
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2175091, member: 28107"]The question isn't whether any pieces exist; for HPA purposes, it merely needs to look like a circulating series. And even if we interpret the HPA as narrowly as you wish to do, the fact is that the 1964-D Peace Dollars were struck. Whether any remain/survive is immaterial to the Title 18 statutes and the HPA. Finally even if we ignore all of this, and adopt your flawed analysis the real legal question is "whether a person of ordinary intellect could reasonably conclude that the 1964-D Peace Dollars exist" and "whether Carr's pieces purport to be or are similar in design/similitude to the 1964-D pieces or other U.S. Peace Dollars struck by the government." (And I am not conceding the first question is relevant; legally the answer to the second one is the only one that matters). And in the government's case against the Norfed man, the fact that he used legends and denominations like those on U.S. currency was enough to convict him even though his coins sought to create an alternative currency and not to copy U.S. coins per se.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2175091, member: 28107"]The question isn't whether any pieces exist; for HPA purposes, it merely needs to look like a circulating series. And even if we interpret the HPA as narrowly as you wish to do, the fact is that the 1964-D Peace Dollars were struck. Whether any remain/survive is immaterial to the Title 18 statutes and the HPA. Finally even if we ignore all of this, and adopt your flawed analysis the real legal question is "whether a person of ordinary intellect could reasonably conclude that the 1964-D Peace Dollars exist" and "whether Carr's pieces purport to be or are similar in design/similitude to the 1964-D pieces or other U.S. Peace Dollars struck by the government." (And I am not conceding the first question is relevant; legally the answer to the second one is the only one that matters). And in the government's case against the Norfed man, the fact that he used legends and denominations like those on U.S. currency was enough to convict him even though his coins sought to create an alternative currency and not to copy U.S. coins per se.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Just got the elusive 1916 Barber Half....
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...