Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Just got the elusive 1916 Barber Half....
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Morgandude11, post: 2172897, member: 37839"]Let's boil this down to basics, and stop the hypercritical stuff that is going on: </p><p><br /></p><p>A) The "tokens" are legal. If you feel it is a loophole, or technicality--don't buy them. Daniel Carr's lawyers will deal with the Hobby Act, and appropriate governmental issues.</p><p>B) They are Art or counterfeits. Once again, the individual has their own strong opinions, and obviously won't change them. I feel that they are very artistic--others don't. To try and convince someone else that they are wrong, and that you are right is virtually impossible.</p><p>C) They aren't cheap. Nor are they equivalent price wise to the parent coin--the Barber Half. So, deal with that as your finances allow.</p><p>D) Daniel Carr's work is not produced with intent to deceive, so it isn't counterfeiting. There isn't a comparison with Chinese fakes, as those are intended to fool inexperienced collectors. It is virtually impossible, unless one is illiterate, to buy one of the fantasy coins from Mr. Carr's website, and not read the disclaimer that it is not legal tender American coinage.</p><p>E) Daniel Carr has produced other collectible tokens and medallions. They're either artistic (I think so, as I collect them) or not, as your collecting tastes go. So, deal with that also. Some people go crazy over Lincoln Cents--to me, I have no interest in them. Likewise, I am sure that folks don't necessarily all love my Morgan dollars.</p><p>F) One should not deface an existing coin. Why not? It is done all the time. Ever see coin jewelry?</p><p>G) The only way to collect Barber halves is to get the genuine, original Barber half. Not necessarily--I have some very nice high grade US Barber non-defaced halves. I have also seen some people go crazy over "good date" extremely worn and overpriced Barbers that look like slugs. It is a matter of taste--as a collector, I would rather have one of Daniel's tokens in MS 69, than a well-circulated original--my taste, not yours.</p><p><br /></p><p>I hope this simplifies and addresses some of the issues.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Morgandude11, post: 2172897, member: 37839"]Let's boil this down to basics, and stop the hypercritical stuff that is going on: A) The "tokens" are legal. If you feel it is a loophole, or technicality--don't buy them. Daniel Carr's lawyers will deal with the Hobby Act, and appropriate governmental issues. B) They are Art or counterfeits. Once again, the individual has their own strong opinions, and obviously won't change them. I feel that they are very artistic--others don't. To try and convince someone else that they are wrong, and that you are right is virtually impossible. C) They aren't cheap. Nor are they equivalent price wise to the parent coin--the Barber Half. So, deal with that as your finances allow. D) Daniel Carr's work is not produced with intent to deceive, so it isn't counterfeiting. There isn't a comparison with Chinese fakes, as those are intended to fool inexperienced collectors. It is virtually impossible, unless one is illiterate, to buy one of the fantasy coins from Mr. Carr's website, and not read the disclaimer that it is not legal tender American coinage. E) Daniel Carr has produced other collectible tokens and medallions. They're either artistic (I think so, as I collect them) or not, as your collecting tastes go. So, deal with that also. Some people go crazy over Lincoln Cents--to me, I have no interest in them. Likewise, I am sure that folks don't necessarily all love my Morgan dollars. F) One should not deface an existing coin. Why not? It is done all the time. Ever see coin jewelry? G) The only way to collect Barber halves is to get the genuine, original Barber half. Not necessarily--I have some very nice high grade US Barber non-defaced halves. I have also seen some people go crazy over "good date" extremely worn and overpriced Barbers that look like slugs. It is a matter of taste--as a collector, I would rather have one of Daniel's tokens in MS 69, than a well-circulated original--my taste, not yours. I hope this simplifies and addresses some of the issues.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Just got the elusive 1916 Barber Half....
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...