Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Just got the elusive 1916 Barber Half....
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2172584, member: 28107"]It is not over until the horse is made into a fine pulp that can be used to make glue... <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>You are ignoring a significant part of 18 USC 485. To fall within the statute, there are two separate offenses codified by an "or" operator meaning that only one is needed to invoke the statute. One offense is creating a piece in the "resemblance or similitude" to U.S. coinage as discussed throughout this thread. The other involves possessing or uttering, and there are separate statutory elements, like what you mention. Either will invoke the statute if you apply the plain meaning of the statute. Reading the first paragraph/statute as superfluous would violate well established principles of statutory interpretation and it would also ignore 18 USC 487, which suggests that it is more than just uttering or passing the coin that the government is concerned with. After all, it is possible to produce the dies without ever striking the first coin.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2172584, member: 28107"]It is not over until the horse is made into a fine pulp that can be used to make glue... ;) You are ignoring a significant part of 18 USC 485. To fall within the statute, there are two separate offenses codified by an "or" operator meaning that only one is needed to invoke the statute. One offense is creating a piece in the "resemblance or similitude" to U.S. coinage as discussed throughout this thread. The other involves possessing or uttering, and there are separate statutory elements, like what you mention. Either will invoke the statute if you apply the plain meaning of the statute. Reading the first paragraph/statute as superfluous would violate well established principles of statutory interpretation and it would also ignore 18 USC 487, which suggests that it is more than just uttering or passing the coin that the government is concerned with. After all, it is possible to produce the dies without ever striking the first coin.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Just got the elusive 1916 Barber Half....
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...