Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 2154510, member: 27832&quot;]Yes, but as you battle this type of abuse, how do you propose to divide your time among:</p><ul> <li>Daniel Carr&#039;s &quot;coins&quot;</li> <li>The widespread use of military challenge &quot;coins&quot;</li> <li>The unregulated sale of chocolate candy &quot;coins&quot;</li> <li>Bit&quot;coins&quot;</li> </ul><p>The Mint statement you quoted is, as you say, a <i>guideline</i>. I agree with them that it&#039;s a bad idea to mislead consumers about the nature of a replica or token. But the term &quot;coin&quot; doesn&#039;t appear <i>on Carr&#039;s restrikes</i> (or, for that matter, on actual legal-tender coinage). It appears on Carr&#039;s Web site, carefully explained; the restrikes are struck on <i>coins</i>, and the product is still a <i>coin</i>, now <i>altered</i>. Carr&#039;s description is explicit and unambiguous.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in