Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Just another Tetricus I antoninianus and a question
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 2861500, member: 75937"]A recent purchase. Fairly nice as far as these go. Sure, it's a bit ragged, but the reverse die wasn't particularly worn when it was struck and Hilaritas's facial features are clear.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]681651[/ATTACH]</p><p>Tetricus I, AD 271-274</p><p>Roman billon antoninianus, 2.74 g, 20.1 mm, 4h</p><p>Mainz or Trier, AD 273-274</p><p>Obv: IMP TETRICVS P F AVG, radiate, cuirassed bust right</p><p>Rev: HILARITAS AVGG, Hilaritas standing left, holding long palm and cornucopiae</p><p>Refs: RIC 80; Cohen 54; RCV 11237.</p><p><br /></p><p>But here's my question:</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's the listing in RIC V2 for this coin:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]681679[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The various obverse legends are numbered--that's clear. What ISN'T clear is what the various bust types are, which are lettered. Where in RIC V does it list the various letters, such as A, C, and F, used to describe the busts? What type is A, for example? What page in which volume of RIC V is this given?</p><p><br /></p><p>I also notice the cross-reference to Cohen is wrong in RIC. RIC says #80 is equivalent to Cohen 57, but that coin in Cohen depicts Fortuna with a rudder and cornucopiae.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks so much! And, of course, you are encouraged to post anything you feel is relevant![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 2861500, member: 75937"]A recent purchase. Fairly nice as far as these go. Sure, it's a bit ragged, but the reverse die wasn't particularly worn when it was struck and Hilaritas's facial features are clear. [ATTACH=full]681651[/ATTACH] Tetricus I, AD 271-274 Roman billon antoninianus, 2.74 g, 20.1 mm, 4h Mainz or Trier, AD 273-274 Obv: IMP TETRICVS P F AVG, radiate, cuirassed bust right Rev: HILARITAS AVGG, Hilaritas standing left, holding long palm and cornucopiae Refs: RIC 80; Cohen 54; RCV 11237. But here's my question: Here's the listing in RIC V2 for this coin: [ATTACH=full]681679[/ATTACH] The various obverse legends are numbered--that's clear. What ISN'T clear is what the various bust types are, which are lettered. Where in RIC V does it list the various letters, such as A, C, and F, used to describe the busts? What type is A, for example? What page in which volume of RIC V is this given? I also notice the cross-reference to Cohen is wrong in RIC. RIC says #80 is equivalent to Cohen 57, but that coin in Cohen depicts Fortuna with a rudder and cornucopiae. Thanks so much! And, of course, you are encouraged to post anything you feel is relevant![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Just another Tetricus I antoninianus and a question
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...