Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Just another boring ancient coin
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1036367, member: 19463"]Coin collectors are a strange lot. I'm as strange as any. Evidence: My latest coin arrival is a not-so-special falling horseman bronze of Constantius II (337-361 AD). These are quite possibly the most common of Roman coins. There are a thousand minor variations and very few people are trying to put together a set (impossible, anyway). The standard catalog, RIC rates this one as common but it is the first one I have seen in person. It is made distinctive by the fancy letter E with < on the middle bar as used to distinguish its issue at the mint of Constantinople. There is a rare version with a dot next to the E but this is not that one so it is common. </p><p><br /></p><p>Usually collectors like me like good looking coins with clear legends but most important is clarity in the mintmark at the bottom of the reverse. The mintmark reads CONS for Constantinople followed by a Greek numeral specifying which of the eleven workshops at that mint produced the coin. Unfortunately this example is not clear. I had to photograph it ten times to get this image that shows, even weakly, the top part of the workshop ID which I will guess to be H (Greek numeral for 8). Usually I avoid common coins with unclear marks but this one was going cheap on eBay so I bid on it and no one else did. I admit that part of the attraction was that the footnote in RIC mentioned this issue seems to have rough style and they rather rarely comment on style. It also appealed because of the E< and the 'rough' portrait with a big nose. After all, how great does a coin have to be to be worth $3.99 plus $3 postage?</p><p><br /></p><p>The point here is that we each should buy what we find interesting. I got $6.99 worth of run out of shooting the photo so many times to get the weak tops of the workshop letter to show. If I were to sell it, I doubt I would get my $6.99 back but I do not recommend ancient coins as a investment. I consider it more like a trip to McDonald's with fewer calories. If you like the coin, enjoy the photo; if not, there are a million other ancient coin types for you to consider a good number of which will cost you less than something you will have to hide from your dietitian.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1036367, member: 19463"]Coin collectors are a strange lot. I'm as strange as any. Evidence: My latest coin arrival is a not-so-special falling horseman bronze of Constantius II (337-361 AD). These are quite possibly the most common of Roman coins. There are a thousand minor variations and very few people are trying to put together a set (impossible, anyway). The standard catalog, RIC rates this one as common but it is the first one I have seen in person. It is made distinctive by the fancy letter E with < on the middle bar as used to distinguish its issue at the mint of Constantinople. There is a rare version with a dot next to the E but this is not that one so it is common. Usually collectors like me like good looking coins with clear legends but most important is clarity in the mintmark at the bottom of the reverse. The mintmark reads CONS for Constantinople followed by a Greek numeral specifying which of the eleven workshops at that mint produced the coin. Unfortunately this example is not clear. I had to photograph it ten times to get this image that shows, even weakly, the top part of the workshop ID which I will guess to be H (Greek numeral for 8). Usually I avoid common coins with unclear marks but this one was going cheap on eBay so I bid on it and no one else did. I admit that part of the attraction was that the footnote in RIC mentioned this issue seems to have rough style and they rather rarely comment on style. It also appealed because of the E< and the 'rough' portrait with a big nose. After all, how great does a coin have to be to be worth $3.99 plus $3 postage? The point here is that we each should buy what we find interesting. I got $6.99 worth of run out of shooting the photo so many times to get the weak tops of the workshop letter to show. If I were to sell it, I doubt I would get my $6.99 back but I do not recommend ancient coins as a investment. I consider it more like a trip to McDonald's with fewer calories. If you like the coin, enjoy the photo; if not, there are a million other ancient coin types for you to consider a good number of which will cost you less than something you will have to hide from your dietitian.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Just another boring ancient coin
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...