Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mark1971, post: 3926364, member: 73818&quot;]Regarding the dot on the reverse being a marker when the hole in the R is not present, I notice that the 1947 example on error-ref has neither of those. Aside from the weight, are there any visible factors on that error-ref 1947 example which confirm it to be a Henning nickel?</p><p>And are you aware of any examples of a legit ‘46 Henning that I can compare to? If not, in light of the characteristics of the ‘47 noted above, what would rule my ‘46 out? Thanks for your help![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in